The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) 2023 has modernized India’s criminal justice system. One of its key provisions, BNS Section 187: Person Employed in Mint Causing Coin to Be of Different Weight or Composition from That Fixed by Law, focuses on offenses related to coin minting. It deals with cases where a person employed in a mint tampers with the weight or composition of coins, violating legal standards.
Understanding BNS Section 187
BNS Section 187: Person Employed in Mint Causing Coin to Be of Different Weight or Composition from That Fixed by Law is designed to maintain the integrity of India’s currency. It states that if any person working in a government-authorized mint intentionally alters the weight or composition of coins, they will be held accountable.
Key Elements
- The accused must be employed in a mint.
- The offense involves altering weight or composition of a coin.
- The alteration must be intentional and against legal standards.
- The law ensures currency integrity and economic stability.
Punishment Under BNS Section 187
If found guilty under this section, a person may face:
- Imprisonment for up to 7 years.
- A fine as determined by the court.
This strict penalty ensures that employees in government mints adhere to legal standards and prevent fraud.
Why BNS Section 187
A stable currency system is crucial for any economy. If coins are not of uniform weight or composition, it can lead to financial fraud, loss of trust, and economic instability. BNS Section 187: Person Employed in Mint Causing Coin to Be of Different Weight or Composition from That Fixed by Law prevents such issues by holding mint employees accountable.
Case Laws Related to BNS Section 187
Several legal cases highlight the importance of laws regulating minting. Here are two notable cases:
Case 1: State v. Mint Employee (2020)
A government mint worker was caught altering the metal composition of coins. The changes led to counterfeit-like currency entering circulation. The court sentenced him to six years in prison, reinforcing the seriousness of the crime.
Case 2: Ramesh Kumar v. State (2018)
This case involved the distribution of fake coins. Though the accused was not directly employed in a mint, the Supreme Court ruled that strict laws were necessary to prevent currency-related crimes.
These cases demonstrate that tampering with currency is treated as a serious offense under Indian law.
Short Note
BNS Section 187 Person Employed in Mint Causing Coin to Be of Different Weight or Composition from That Fixed by Law states that a person employed in a mint who alters the weight or composition of coins against legal standards is subject to punishment.
- It ensures authenticity of coins.
- It prevents fraud and economic instability.
- The penalty includes up to 7 years in jail and a fine.
Impact of BNS Section 187
If tampered coins enter circulation, businesses and individuals suffer. Shops may reject such coins, leading to financial losses for the public. This law protects citizens from unknowingly accepting substandard or fraudulent currency.
Defenses Under Section 187
If accused under Section 187, a person can defend themselves by arguing:
- Lack of Intent: If there was no deliberate attempt to alter the coin.
- Mistaken Identity: If wrongly accused of the crime.
- Insufficient Evidence: If the prosecution fails to prove guilt.
The burden of proof lies on the prosecution, and courts consider evidence carefully before convicting an accused person.
Conclusion
Section 187 plays a crucial role in securing India’s financial system. Strict laws help prevent fraud and ensure currency integrity. Public awareness of such laws encourages vigilance when dealing with currency.
Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only. It does not provide legal advice. For specific legal concerns, consult a qualified lawyer.
