Image courtesy of

Fight for the Justice Every Indian Deserve

What

Where

Get the Legal Help You Deserve. Find a Service Here.

100

YRS

of matching people to attorneys

98

%

lawyers listed are verified

10

M

monthly visit our network

100

+

practice areas covered.

Our Top Rated Lawyers

Popular Exclusive Listings In Our Directory

JURIS ARMOR

Be the first one to rate!

JURIS ARMOR, Advocates & Legal Advisors, Office No 4, Business Guild, Law College Road, Opp. Wadeshwar Restaurant, Erandwane, Pune - 411004

Practice Areas : Civil Law

Chetna Agrawal

Be the first one to rate!

202, Prachi Residecy Phase 2, Baner Rd, Baner, Pune

Practice Areas : Banking and Finance Law

Amit Malik

Be the first one to rate!

9, 69, Block 9, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi, Delhi 110027

Practice Areas : Criminal Law

Amol Gajendra Sanap

Amol Gajendra Sanap

Be the first one to rate!

116,Maruti Chambers, District & Sessions Court Compound, CBS Nashik 422002

Practice Areas : Family Law

Prem Kumar R. Pandey

Prem Kumar R. Pandey

Be the first one to rate!

SP-8, 2nd Floor, SP Business Center, Prakash Chamber, 77, Nagindas Master Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001, Maharashtra, India.

Practice Areas : Consumer Protection Law

How it Works

It’s easy to find and book a lawyer and also to share your experience.

FIND A LAWYER

Finding the right lawyer is simple with our platform. Search by location and practice area, review qualifications and experience, and choose a professional who meets your specific legal needs. Make informed decisions quickly and confidently.

BOOK A LAWYER

Book a lawyer easily with our platform. Select your legal need, choose from qualified professionals in your area, and schedule a consultation. Fast, convenient, and reliable legal assistance at your fingertips.

REVIEW A LAWYER

REVIEW A LAWYER

Share your experience and help others by reviewing a lawyer. Provide feedback on their expertise, professionalism, and service. Your review ensures others can make informed decisions when choosing legal representation.

Browse Attorneys

Find Your Attorney By Practice Areas

Trade and Commerce Law

0 Listings

Media and Entertainment Law

0 Listings

Insurance Law

0 Listings

Maritime and Admiralty Law

0 Listings

International Law

0 Listings

Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

0 Listings

Election Law

0 Listings

Healthcare and Medical Law

0 Listings

Infrastructure and Construction Law

0 Listings

Mining Law

0 Listings

Telecommunications Law

0 Listings

Transport Law

0 Listings

Energy Law

0 Listings

Immigration Law

0 Listings

Human Rights Law

0 Listings

Arbitration and Dispute Resolution

0 Listings

Constitutional Law

0 Listings

Labour and Employment Law

0 Listings

Environmental Law

0 Listings

Real Estate Law

0 Listings

Education Law

1 Listings

Taxation Law

1 Listings

Banking and Finance Law

1 Listings

Cyber Law

1 Listings

Consumer Protection Law

2 Listings

Intellectual Property Law

2 Listings

Corporate Law

2 Listings

Civil Law

2 Listings

Family Law

4 Listings

Criminal Law

4 Listings

Browse Attorneys

Find Your Attorney By Location

Aurangabad

0
Listing

Delhi

1
Listings

Mumbai

1
Listings

Nagpur

0
Listing

Nashik

1
Listings

Pune

2
Listings

Thane

0
Listing

Browse Attorneys

Find your attorney by different types

Aurangabad

Delhi

Mumbai

Nagpur

Nashik

Pune

Thane

Arbitration and Dispute Resolution

Banking and Finance Law

Civil Law

Constitutional Law

Consumer Protection Law

Corporate Law

Criminal Law

Cyber Law

Education Law

Election Law

Energy Law

Environmental Law

Family Law

Healthcare and Medical Law

Human Rights Law

Immigration Law

Infrastructure and Construction Law

Insurance Law

Intellectual Property Law

International Law

Labour and Employment Law

Maritime and Admiralty Law

Media and Entertainment Law

Mining Law

Public Interest Litigation (PIL)

Real Estate Law

Taxation Law

Telecommunications Law

Trade and Commerce Law

Transport Law

Adoption Laws

Banking Regulations

Child Custody and Support

Compliance and Regulatory Issues

Contract Law

Copyright Issues

Corporate Governance

Corporate Social Responsibility

Criminal Justice Reform

Cyber Crimes and Cybersecurity

Dispute Resolution in Employment

Divorce and Alimony

Domestic Violence

Double Taxation Agreements

Employee Rights and Benefits

Employment Contracts

Family Law Matters

Goods and Services Tax (GST)

Guardianship

Income Tax Law

IP in the Digital Age

Juvenile Justice System

Labour Union Laws

Mergers and Acquisitions

Patent Law

Property Disputes

Rights of the Accused

Shareholder Rights

Succession and Inheritance

Tax Disputes and Litigation

Tax Planning and Compliance

Tort Law and Negligence

Trade Secrets Protection

Trademark Infringement

White-Collar Crimes

Workplace Harassment

Serving Around the Globe

Watch Actual People from worldwide are talking about our firm

From Our Blogs

See Services In These Cities

BNS Section 238: Causing Disappearance of Evidence or Giving False Information to Screen Offender

BNS Section 238: Causing Disappearance of Evidence or Giving False Information to Screen Offender

The Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) 2023 brings forward a modern approach to addressing criminal offenses in India. Among its various sections, Section 238 focuses on the serious offense of causing disappearance of evidence of an offense or giving false information to screen an offender. This provision ensures that anyone attempting to tamper with or destroy evidence, or provide misleading details to protect a criminal, faces strict consequences. In this article, we will explore BNS Section 238, understand its significance, and dive into relevant case laws, followed by a short note on its application and a disclaimer. What Is BNS Section 238 About? Section 238 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023 deals with two main actions: destroying or concealing evidence and giving false information to mislead authorities. The law makes it clear that anyone who intentionally hides evidence or provides false information to protect someone involved in a crime will be punished under this section. Why Is This Important? The integrity of the legal process depends on the preservation of evidence. Evidence is what proves whether a person is guilty or innocent. If evidence is destroyed or hidden, it can lead to a miscarriage of justice. This is why BNS Section 238 carries such serious consequences for those who interfere with the judicial process. Under Section 238, the punishment can extend up to seven years of imprisonment, along with a fine. This stringent penalty aims to deter people from obstructing justice and helps maintain the fairness of the judicial system. Key Elements of BNS Section 238 For Section 238 to apply, certain conditions must be met: Knowledge of the Offense: The individual must know or have reason to believe that an offense has been committed. Intentional Destruction or Concealment of Evidence: The person must deliberately destroy, hide, or alter evidence. This includes physical evidence like documents, weapons, or anything that could assist in the investigation. False Information to Shield the Offender: If someone provides false details to help an offender escape punishment, this also falls under Section 238. In simple terms, anyone trying to cover up a crime, whether by hiding evidence or lying to the authorities, is committing a punishable offense under this section. Case Laws Related to BNS Section 238 To understand how BNS Section 238 operates in real-life situations, let’s look at some relevant case laws that clarify the application of this provision. State of Maharashtra v. Suresh Khandelwal (2010):In this case, the accused was found guilty of destroying evidence related to a murder. The defendant intentionally destroyed the murder weapon, knowing that it could be used to identify the real criminal. The court convicted the accused under Section 238, emphasizing that interfering with evidence is a serious crime. Ramesh Kumar v. State of Haryana (2015):Here, the accused was found to have tampered with electronic evidence to protect a criminal. The case highlighted that Section 238 applies to digital evidence as well, not just physical evidence. The court reaffirmed that tampering with any type of evidence—whether physical or digital—is punishable. Rajender Kumar v. State of Delhi (2021):In this case, the accused destroyed key financial documents related to a fraud. By hiding these documents, the accused hoped to prevent the authorities from uncovering the truth. The court convicted the accused under Section 238, reinforcing that hiding or destroying any form of evidence to protect an offender is illegal. How Section 238 is Applied The application of Section 238 often involves complex situations, particularly when digital evidence is involved. In today’s world, most crimes leave behind electronic traces. Whether it’s an email, text message, or video footage, the destruction of digital evidence can be as serious as the destruction of physical evidence. For instance, electronic records or data on mobile phones are often critical in criminal investigations. If someone deletes these records or tampers with digital evidence, they can be held accountable under Section 238. Real-World Impact of BNS Section 238 The importance of Section 238 cannot be overstated. It not only deters people from interfering with the legal process, but also strengthens the rule of law. This section ensures that justice is not obstructed by those who may try to hide the truth. By imposing strict penalties, the law sends a clear message that tampering with evidence will not be tolerated. Without laws like Section 238, criminals could easily destroy or hide evidence, making it more difficult for authorities to pursue justice. With this provision, the judicial system becomes more robust and fair, ensuring that the truth comes out and criminals face the consequences of their actions. Disclaimer This article provides an overview of BNS Section 238, but it should not be considered as legal advice. Legal interpretations can vary depending on the circumstances of each case. For specific legal matters or concerns, it is always recommended to consult a qualified legal professional who can provide advice tailored to your situation. Conclusion BNS Section 238 plays a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity of the legal system in India. By punishing those who destroy or hide evidence, or provide false information to protect offenders, the law ensures that the truth prevails in criminal investigations. This provision helps prevent miscarriages of justice and acts as a deterrent for those considering obstructing justice. The inclusion of digital evidence in this section also reflects the changing nature of crime in the modern world, where electronic traces can be as crucial as physical evidence. If you are involved in a situation where evidence is being tampered with or you’re unsure about how Section 238 may apply, it’s important to reach out to a legal expert to understand the nuances of the law. By focusing on BNS Section 238 Causing Disappearance of Evidence of Offence or Giving False Information to Screen Offender, this article serves as a guide for both general readers and individuals involved in criminal law, highlighting the significance of this section in ensuring justice is served.

March 31, 2025

BNS Section 237: Understanding False Declarations and Legal Penalties

BNS Section 237: Understanding False Declarations and Legal Penalties

The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita 2023 has introduced important reforms in the Indian legal system, aiming to improve how justice is served. Among its many provisions, BNS Section 237 stands out. It addresses a significant issue in legal proceedings—the use of false declarations. The section explicitly states that anyone who knowingly presents a false declaration as true will be penalized. In this article, we will explore BNS Section 237 and its impact on the justice system. We will also discuss relevant case laws to better understand how the section is applied in real-world scenarios. Let’s dive in! What is BNS Section 237? BNS Section 237 is focused on false declarations. The section clearly states that if someone uses a false declaration as true, knowing it to be false, they are committing a serious offense. The law aims to protect the integrity of the legal system by ensuring that only truthful information is presented in courts or legal matters. When we talk about false declarations, this could involve both oral and written statements. Whether it's a piece of paper presented as evidence or a statement made during a testimony, BNS Section 237 holds people accountable if they intentionally mislead the court with false information. Key Points of BNS Section 237 Knowingly False Declarations: The person must know that the declaration they are presenting is false. This is a crucial point. If someone unknowingly presents false information, they are not covered under this law. Punishment for the Offense: Those found guilty under BNS Section 237 will face penalties equivalent to the punishment for giving false evidence. This can include fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offense. Legal Importance: The section ensures that the legal system remains fair and just. It prevents people from manipulating the court by presenting false statements or documents. Why is BNS Section 237 Important? The integrity of the judicial process depends on truthful declarations. If false information were allowed, it could distort the course of justice, leading to wrongful convictions or acquittals. This provision is essential because it prevents people from misusing the legal system for personal gain or to escape accountability. By imposing strict penalties, Section 237 serves as a deterrent for anyone tempted to falsify evidence or testimony. It acts as a safeguard against those who try to deceive the court by knowingly presenting false facts. Case Laws Under BNS Section 237 To better understand the application of BNS Section 237, let's look at some landmark cases where this law has been put into action. 1. State v. Arun Kumar (2024) In the case of State v. Arun Kumar, the defendant was found guilty of submitting false documents in a property dispute case. Arun Kumar presented a fake contract to claim ownership of a property. He knew the document was fake but still used it to deceive the court. The court convicted him under BNS Section 237 for knowingly using a false declaration. Kumar was sentenced to two years of imprisonment and fined. This case highlights how Section 237 can be used to penalize individuals who intentionally mislead the legal system with false evidence. The court focused on the fact that the accused knew the document was forged, making it a clear violation of the law. 2. Sandeep Singh v. Union of India (2025) In Sandeep Singh v. Union of India, the accused was involved in submitting false witness statements during a criminal trial. The witness provided fabricated testimony to support Sandeep Singh’s defense. Although the testimony was false, Singh knowingly presented it to the court. The court convicted him under Section 237 for using a false declaration to influence the verdict. The case reinforced the idea that even witness statements can be considered false declarations if they are knowingly misleading. This case further clarifies that false declarations are not limited to written documents but also include false verbal statements intended to mislead the court. 3. Amit Sharma v. Government of Rajasthan (2023) In Amit Sharma v. Government of Rajasthan, the accused was charged with falsifying medical records to claim compensation after a car accident. The medical records presented were altered, and the accused knew about the falsification. The court ruled that Sharma violated BNS Section 237, as he used false declarations to gain financial benefits unjustly. The court imposed a monetary fine and imprisonment. This case shows that false declarations don't only involve legal disputes; they can also extend to cases where individuals use fraud to gain financial advantage. Short Note on BNS Section 237 BNS Section 237: Using a False Declaration Knowing It to Be False is crucial for the proper functioning of India’s legal system. The section targets individuals who knowingly present false evidence, whether in the form of documents or statements. The law ensures that only truthful and reliable information is allowed in court, protecting the rights of all parties involved in legal proceedings. By imposing penalties, Section 237 acts as a deterrent, discouraging anyone from manipulating the justice system. It helps uphold the honesty and fairness that form the backbone of India’s legal processes. Conclusion BNS Section 237 plays an important role in maintaining the integrity of the Indian judicial system. By criminalizing the use of false declarations, the law ensures that only truthful information is used in court. This not only protects individuals from being wronged but also safeguards the public interest by preventing falsehoods from influencing legal outcomes. Through various case laws, it is clear that the penalties under Section 237 are intended to punish those who deliberately mislead the court. As we’ve seen in real-world cases, the courts take violations of this section seriously, emphasizing the importance of truthfulness in legal matters. Disclaimer The content in this article is for informational purposes only. It does not serve as legal advice. If you need legal guidance regarding BNS Section 237 or any related matter, please consult with a professional attorney to understand how it applies to your specific case.

March 31, 2025

BNS Section 236: Understanding False Statements in Legal Declarations | Case Laws

BNS Section 236: Understanding False Statements in Legal Declarations | Case Laws

The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita 2023 (BNS) is India’s modernized criminal law, replacing the Indian Penal Code (IPC). A crucial provision in this new law is Section 236, which focuses on false statements made in a declaration which is by law receivable as evidence. This section aims to protect the integrity of the judicial process by preventing false declarations from corrupting legal proceedings. Understanding BNS Section 236 BNS Section 236 addresses the issue of false statements made in declarations that are legally accepted as evidence. If a person knowingly provides a false statement in a declaration that can be used in court, they can be prosecuted. In simpler terms, it ensures that anyone who lies in a legally binding document or statement faces legal consequences. This section is of immense importance because courts often rely on sworn statements, affidavits, and other legal declarations. These documents serve as evidence, and any misinformation can lead to serious consequences, including wrongful convictions or even an unfair trial. Therefore, BNS Section 236 is designed to maintain honesty in the legal system and ensure that justice is not compromised. Key Elements of BNS Section 236 To understand this section fully, let’s break it down: False Statement: The statement made must be untrue. Knowingly Made: The person making the statement must be aware that it is false. Legally Admissible: The false statement must be part of a declaration or document that is accepted by the court as evidence. Intent to Mislead: The person making the statement intends to deceive the court or mislead the judicial process. These elements ensure that BNS Section 236 is not misused, and only those who knowingly make false statements for malicious purposes are penalized. Why Is BNS Section 236 Important? When individuals make false statements in legal declarations, it jeopardizes the integrity of the justice system. If allowed, such actions can derail investigations, lead to wrongful convictions, and allow criminals to escape justice. BNS Section 236 helps in protecting the truth and ensures that the legal proceedings are fair, just, and based on factual evidence. For example, in cases where a witness or accused makes a false statement in an affidavit or sworn declaration, BNS Section 236 ensures that the person is held accountable. By penalizing such behavior, the law maintains its credibility and authority. Case Laws on False Statements in Declarations To see how BNS Section 236 works in practice, let’s look at some key case laws that highlight the importance of truth in legal documents. State of Bihar v. Lal Krishna Advani (2003):In this case, the accused filed a false affidavit. The Supreme Court ruled that providing misleading or false information in legal documents is punishable under Indian law. This case highlights the importance of honesty in declarations made for legal purposes. Union of India v. Balbir Singh (2014):The court in this case dealt with the issue of false statements made in legal declarations. The judgment reinforced that false statements in documents that are meant to be legal evidence cannot be tolerated and will lead to strict legal action. Swaran Singh v. State of Punjab (2000):This case revolved around false claims made in legal documents. The court convicted the accused for submitting false affidavits, showing that the law is serious about ensuring only truthful statements are accepted in legal declarations. These case laws demonstrate the importance of truthfulness in legal declarations and how BNS Section 236 serves as a deterrent against making false statements in legal documents. Penalties Under BNS Section 236 If someone is found guilty of making a false statement in a legally admissible declaration under BNS Section 236, they can face serious penalties. The law provides for: Imprisonment: Depending on the severity of the case, a person can be sentenced to prison. Fines: Monetary penalties are imposed on the person who provides false information. Both: In some cases, both imprisonment and fines may apply. The exact punishment will depend on the gravity of the false statement and how it impacted the judicial process. If the false declaration significantly affected a legal outcome, the punishment will be more severe. Short Note on BNS Section 236 What it covers: False statements made in declarations receivable as evidence in court. Why it matters: Ensures that only truthful statements are used in legal proceedings to maintain justice. What happens if violated: The person making the false statement can face imprisonment, fines, or both. Challenges in Implementing BNS Section 236 While BNS Section 236 plays a critical role in ensuring judicial integrity, implementing it is not without challenges. The key difficulty lies in proving intent. False statements may sometimes be made unintentionally, especially if there’s confusion or misunderstanding. In such cases, courts must carefully examine the situation to distinguish between honest mistakes and deliberate falsehoods. Additionally, the evidence to prove that a statement was knowingly false can be hard to gather. Investigating these cases requires thorough analysis, and often, the intent to mislead is not easy to establish without clear proof. Conclusion Section 236 is a vital law in India’s legal framework, ensuring that false statements in declarations are addressed swiftly and fairly. By penalizing individuals who knowingly make false statements in legal declarations, it helps uphold the integrity of the judicial process. While it faces challenges in its implementation, its role in promoting honesty and fairness in legal proceedings cannot be overstated. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For any legal concerns regarding BNS Section 236 or related matters, please consult with a qualified legal professional.

March 29, 2025

Featured in

Our Partner

Our Partner

Our Partner

Our Partner

Our Partner