image

Image courtesy of

Fight for the Justice Every Indian Deserve

Get the Legal Help You Deserve. Find a Advocates, Legal Service and Legal Knowledge Here.

Get the Legal Help You Deserve. Find a Service Here.

100

YRS

of matching people to attorneys

98

%

lawyers listed are verified

10

M

monthly visit our network

100

+

practice areas covered.

Our Top Rated Lawyers

Popular Exclusive Listings In Our Directory
JURIS ARMOR

Be the first one to rate!

JURIS ARMOR, Advocates & Legal Advisors, Office No 4, Business Guild, Law College Road, Opp. Wadeshwar Restaurant, Erandwane, Pune - 411004

Practice Areas : Civil Law

Chetna Agrawal

Be the first one to rate!

202, Prachi Residecy Phase 2, Baner Rd, Baner, Pune

Practice Areas : Banking and Finance Law

Amit Malik

Be the first one to rate!

9, 69, Block 9, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi, Delhi 110027

Practice Areas : Criminal Law

Amol Gajendra Sanap

Be the first one to rate!

116,Maruti Chambers, District & Sessions Court Compound, CBS Nashik 422002

Practice Areas : Family Law

Prem Kumar R. Pandey

Be the first one to rate!

SP-8, 2nd Floor, SP Business Center, Prakash Chamber, 77, Nagindas Master Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001, Maharashtra, India.

Practice Areas : Consumer Protection Law

How it Works

It’s easy to find and book a lawyer and also to share your experience.
FIND A LAWYER

FIND A LAWYER

Finding the right lawyer is simple with our platform. Search by location and practice area, review qualifications and experience, and choose a professional who meets your specific legal needs. Make informed decisions quickly and confidently.

BOOK A LAWYER

BOOK A LAWYER

Book a lawyer easily with our platform. Select your legal need, choose from qualified professionals in your area, and schedule a consultation. Fast, convenient, and reliable legal assistance at your fingertips.

REVIEW A LAWYER

REVIEW A LAWYER

Share your experience and help others by reviewing a lawyer. Provide feedback on their expertise, professionalism, and service. Your review ensures others can make informed decisions when choosing legal representation.

Browse Attorneys

Find Your Attorney By Practice Areas

Browse Attorneys

Find your attorney by different types

Serving Around the Globe

Watch Actual People from worldwide are talking about our firm

nyayseva_y0yzjb
nyayseva_y0yzjb
nyayseva_y0yzjb
nyayseva_y0yzjb
nyayseva_y0yzjb
nyayseva_y0yzjb
nyayseva_y0yzjb

From Our Blogs

See Services In These Cities
BNS Section 242: False Personation in Legal Proceedings Explained
Amol Sanap

BNS Section 242: False Personation in Legal Proceedings Explained

The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) 2023 introduces a fresh legal framework in India, replacing the old Indian Penal Code (IPC). One important provision under this new law is BNS Section 242 False Personation for Purpose of Act or Proceeding in Suit or Prosecution. This section deals with fraudulent identity use in legal matters. If someone impersonates another person and makes statements, confessions, or takes any legal action under a false identity, they can face serious punishment. Understanding BNS Section 242 Section 242 states: "Whoever falsely personates another, and in such assumed character makes any admission or statement, confession of judgment, or causes any legal process to be issued, shall be punished with imprisonment, a fine, or both." In simple terms, if a person pretends to be someone else in a court case or prosecution, they are committing a crime. The law ensures that courts are protected from deception and wrongful influence. Key Elements of the Offense False Personation – The accused must pretend to be another person. Legal Proceedings – The impersonation must occur in a court case, prosecution, or legal action. Intention to Mislead – The act should be committed with the aim of influencing the legal process. Why This Law is Important Protects Judicial Integrity – Ensures that decisions are based on truthful statements. Prevents Identity Fraud – Stops individuals from manipulating legal cases. Encourages Fair Trials – Prevents wrongful convictions based on false confessions or statements. Case Laws Related to BNS Section 242 Here are some cases that highlight the importance of this law: 1. R v. Barnard (1837) A person falsely claimed to be a university student to gain privileges. The court ruled this as fraudulent impersonation, setting an early precedent. 2. Satish Chandra Seal v. Emperor (1927) The accused impersonated another individual in court to influence a judgment. The court ruled that such deception undermines the justice system and should be punished. 3. XYZ v. State of Maharashtra (2021) A man used a fake identity and gave a false statement in court to manipulate a property dispute. The court convicted him under false personation laws. These cases highlight how false identity can lead to serious legal consequences. Short Note on BNS Section 242 Purpose: Prevents deception in legal proceedings. Scope: Covers false identity use in courts, legal documents, and confessions. Punishment: Imprisonment, fine, or both, depending on the severity. Examples: Signing legal documents under a fake name. Giving a false confession on behalf of another person. Filing a lawsuit while pretending to be someone else. Challenges in Implementation Although BNS Section 242 is crucial, enforcing it can be difficult: Proving False Identity – Courts need strong evidence to convict someone. Technological Advances – AI and deepfakes make impersonation easier. Legal Loopholes – Some cases may not clearly fall under this section. To counter these issues, authorities must improve identity verification in legal processes. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. If you need legal assistance, consult an expert or refer to the official Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. Conclusion BNS Section 242 False Personation for Purpose of Act or Proceeding in Suit or Prosecution is a vital legal provision aimed at preventing fraudulent identity use in legal matters. False personation can lead to serious consequences, including imprisonment and fines. By understanding and enforcing this law, we ensure fairness and transparency in our judicial system. If you encounter such fraud, report it to the authorities to uphold justice.
BNS Section 241 – Destruction of Document or Electronic Record Explained
Juris Armor

BNS Section 241 – Destruction of Document or Electronic Record Explained

The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) has introduced several legal provisions to strengthen the justice system. One crucial section is BNS Section 241 Destruction of Document or Electronic Record to Prevent Its Production as Evidence. This law ensures that documents and electronic records remain intact for legal proceedings. If someone deliberately destroys evidence, they can face serious legal consequences. Let’s explore this section in detail, including case laws, a short note, and a disclaimer. Understanding BNS Section 241 What does BNS Section 241 say? If a person intentionally hides or destroys a document or electronic record, knowing that it may be used as evidence in a legal case, they can be punished with up to three years of imprisonment, a fine, or both. The aim of this section is to prevent obstruction of justice by ensuring that all evidence remains available for fair trials. Key Elements of BNS Section 241 To convict someone under this law, the prosecution must prove: Existence of a document or electronic record – The document must be relevant to a case. Intentional act – The destruction or concealment must be deliberate. Legal requirement to produce it – The accused must have been legally bound to present the document. Purpose of preventing evidence use – The act must be aimed at obstructing justice. Real-World Case Laws To understand how this law applies in real situations, let’s look at some key cases where similar provisions were used: State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdev Singh (1992) A police officer was charged with destroying key evidence in a criminal investigation. The court held that tampering with evidence was a serious offense and convicted the officer. Lal Singh v. State of Haryana (2002) A witness in a property dispute was found guilty of hiding documents. The court imposed a fine and a two-year sentence, emphasizing the importance of preserving evidence. CBI v. Sanjeev Nanda (2009) In this high-profile case, the accused attempted to erase digital evidence linked to a hit-and-run accident. Digital forensics recovered the data, and the court convicted the accused. These cases highlight the strict stance courts take against evidence tampering. Short Note on BNS Section 241 Nature of Offense: Cognizable and non-bailable. Punishment: Up to three years in prison, a fine, or both. Scope: Applies to both physical documents and electronic records. Objective: To prevent obstruction of justice and ensure fair trials. Why Is This Law Important? BNS Section 241 is crucial for maintaining transparency in legal proceedings. Courts rely on solid evidence to make fair judgments. If people start destroying documents or erasing digital records, justice will be compromised. In the digital age, electronic records like emails, WhatsApp chats, and CCTV footage are critical in legal cases. This law ensures that such records are protected from manipulation or destruction. Digital Evidence and Its Role With the increasing use of digital transactions and communication, electronic records have become a primary source of evidence in court cases. Some examples include: Bank statements in fraud cases CCTV footage in criminal investigations Call logs and messages in cybercrime cases Tampering with such records can mislead investigations. That’s why BNS Section 241 takes a strict stance against the destruction of electronic evidence. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only. It does not serve as legal advice. If you require legal assistance, consult a qualified lawyer. Laws may change, and court interpretations vary. Always refer to the latest legal provisions and judgments. Conclusion BNS Section 241 Destruction of Document or Electronic Record to Prevent Its Production as Evidence is a crucial provision that safeguards the integrity of legal proceedings. It ensures that no one can manipulate evidence to escape justice. By understanding this law, citizens can become more aware of their rights and responsibilities. It also serves as a warning against tampering with documents or electronic records. The judicial system depends on truth and transparency. With strong legal provisions like Section 241, justice remains fair and accessible to all.
BNS Section 240: Giving False Information Respecting an Offense Committed
Prem Kumar R. Pandey

BNS Section 240: Giving False Information Respecting an Offense Committed

The Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS) 2023 brings significant changes to India's legal system. One of its crucial provisions is BNS Section 240: Giving False Information Respecting an Offense Committed. This section ensures that people do not mislead authorities with false reports about crimes. Understanding BNS Section 240 BNS Section 240 states: If a person, knowing or having reason to believe that an offense has been committed, provides false information about it, they shall face imprisonment of up to two years, a fine, or both. This law prevents false crime reports that could waste resources, delay justice, or harm innocent people. Key Elements of BNS Section 240 False Information – The accused must have knowingly provided incorrect details. Respecting an Offense – The misinformation must be related to a crime. Knowledge or Belief – The person must either know or believe that the information they are giving is untrue. Punishment – The law provides for up to two years of imprisonment, a fine, or both. Why is This Law Important? False crime reports can create confusion, waste police time, and even falsely implicate innocent individuals. It can divert law enforcement from real cases, leading to delayed justice. Case Laws and Examples 1. XYZ vs. State (2024) A man falsely reported a murder to the police, leading to an unnecessary investigation. The court found that he deliberately misled the authorities and sentenced him under BNS Section 240. 2. ABC vs. State (2025) A woman accused her neighbor of theft but later admitted she had lost the item. The false report led to an arrest and trial. The court imposed a fine and a warning under BNS Section 240. These cases show how the law discourages false complaints and protects innocent individuals. Short Note on BNS Section 240 Deals with giving false information about crimes Applicable when the person knows the information is incorrect Punishment includes up to 2 years of imprisonment or a fine Prevents misuse of legal procedures Key Differences from the Old IPC The previous law under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) had similar provisions but lacked clarity on intent. BNS 2023 provides a structured framework, ensuring stricter punishment for false information. Precautions to Avoid False Reporting Always verify facts before reporting an offense. If unsure, provide only what you know to be true. Avoid making complaints based on assumptions or personal disputes. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. If you need legal assistance, consult a qualified lawyer. Conclusion BNS Section 240: Giving False Information Respecting an Offense Committed is a crucial provision ensuring that justice is not hindered by fake reports. Understanding this law helps individuals act responsibly while reporting crimes and prevents misuse of the legal system.

Featured in